TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

PATH vs QLYS: PATH vs QLYS

PATH (PATH) and QLYS (QLYS) on Torvanta's measures: PATH grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and QLYS on 2.

PATHQLYS
Value gradeC+D+
Growth gradeA-B-
Profitability gradeBA
Momentum gradeC+A
Market value$6.9B$6.9B
P/E (trailing)19.6x34.4x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)13.1x32.1x
Revenue, last 12 months$1.7B$703.0M
Revenue growth (y/y)+15%+10%
Operating margin8.9%34.4%
Return on invested capital11.4%61.1%
Free-cash-flow yield5.3%4.6%
Total return, 1 year+2.0%+51.6%
Total return, 3 years-19.0%+28.4%

Full PATH analysis · Full QLYS analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, PATH or QLYS?

PATH (PATH) and QLYS (QLYS) on Torvanta's measures: PATH grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and QLYS on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, PATH or QLYS?

On trailing earnings PATH trades at 19.6x and QLYS at 34.4x; their value grades are C+ and D+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer