TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

MTB vs RF: M&T Bank vs Regions

M&T Bank (MTB) and Regions (RF) on Torvanta's measures: MTB grades higher on 4 of the 4 factor families and RF on 0.

MTBRF
Value gradeBB-
Growth gradeC+D+
Profitability gradeB-D+
Momentum gradeC+C
Market value$31.5B$23.1B
P/E (trailing)11.5x11.0x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)10.2x10.0x
Revenue, last 12 months$1.7Bn/a
Revenue growth (y/y)+6%n/a
Operating marginn/a0.0%
Return on invested capitaln/an/a
Free-cash-flow yield12.1%7.7%
Total return, 1 year+15.4%+6.7%
Total return, 3 years+95.0%+89.2%

Full MTB analysis · Full RF analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, MTB or RF?

M&T Bank (MTB) and Regions (RF) on Torvanta's measures: MTB grades higher on 4 of the 4 factor families and RF on 0. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, MTB or RF?

On trailing earnings MTB trades at 11.5x and RF at 11.0x; their value grades are B and B- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer