TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-15

MPWR vs QCOM: Monolithic Power vs Qualcomm

Monolithic Power (MPWR) and Qualcomm (QCOM) on Torvanta's measures: MPWR grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and QCOM on 2.

MPWRQCOM
Value gradeD+B+
Growth gradeC-D-
Profitability gradeC+C+
Momentum gradeC-C
Market value$61.4B$187.3B
P/E (trailing)76.0x20.4x
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)44.1x18.0x
Revenue, last 12 months$3.3B$44.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+29%+2%
Operating margin28.7%23.2%
Return on invested capital26.6%22.0%
Free-cash-flow yield1.0%5.6%
Total return, 1 year+24.7%+11.8%
Total return, 3 years+168.3%+75.0%

Full MPWR analysis · Full QCOM analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, MPWR or QCOM?

Monolithic Power (MPWR) and Qualcomm (QCOM) on Torvanta's measures: MPWR grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and QCOM on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, MPWR or QCOM?

On trailing earnings MPWR trades at 76.0x and QCOM at 20.4x; their value grades are D+ and B+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer