TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

MNST vs PEP: Monster Beverage vs PepsiCo

Monster Beverage (MNST) and PepsiCo (PEP) on Torvanta's measures: MNST grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and PEP on 2.

MNSTPEP
Value gradeCB
Growth gradeB+A-
Profitability gradeB+B+
Momentum gradeB-D+
Market value$42.6B$171.5B
P/E (trailing)n/a16.5x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)n/a14.4x
Revenue, last 12 months$9.2B$96.9B
Revenue growth (y/y)+20%+6%
Operating margin29.2%14.8%
Return on invested capital28.7%85.4%
Free-cash-flow yield4.9%5.4%
Total return, 1 year+29.5%-7.9%
Total return, 3 years+73.7%-12.6%

Full MNST analysis · Full PEP analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, MNST or PEP?

Monster Beverage (MNST) and PepsiCo (PEP) on Torvanta's measures: MNST grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and PEP on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, MNST or PEP?

On trailing earnings MNST trades at n/a and PEP at 16.5x; their value grades are C and B against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer