TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

MKC vs SJM: McCormick vs JM Smucker

McCormick (MKC) and JM Smucker (SJM) on Torvanta's measures: MKC grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and SJM on 1.

MKCSJM
Value gradeAD+
Growth gradeAA-
Profitability gradeB-C
Momentum gradeD-B+
Market value$12.3B$12.4B
P/E (trailing)7.6x54.3x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)5.2x54.3x
Revenue, last 12 months$7.4B$9.2B
Revenue growth (y/y)+10%+5%
Operating margin14.9%9.0%
Return on invested capital8.2%4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield8.3%12.8%
Total return, 1 year-31.8%+11.7%
Total return, 3 years-24.6%+12.0%

Full MKC analysis · Full SJM analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, MKC or SJM?

McCormick (MKC) and JM Smucker (SJM) on Torvanta's measures: MKC grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and SJM on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, MKC or SJM?

On trailing earnings MKC trades at 7.6x and SJM at 54.3x; their value grades are A and D+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer