TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

LMAT vs UFPT: LeMaitre Vascular vs UFP Technologies, Inc.

LeMaitre Vascular (LMAT) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) on Torvanta's measures: LMAT grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and UFPT on 1.

LMATUFPT
Value gradeCC-
Growth gradeB-C-
Profitability gradeB+C+
Momentum gradeDB+
Market value$1.9B$2.4B
P/E (trailing)28.4x33.1x
Revenue, last 12 months$262.4M$631.6M
Revenue growth (y/y)+12%+7%
Operating margin29.5%15.3%
Return on invested capital15.2%13.8%
Free-cash-flow yield4.0%3.0%
Total return, 1 year-6.5%+52.2%
Total return, 3 years+44.6%+83.0%

Full LMAT analysis · Full UFPT analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, LMAT or UFPT?

LeMaitre Vascular (LMAT) and UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) on Torvanta's measures: LMAT grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and UFPT on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, LMAT or UFPT?

On trailing earnings LMAT trades at 28.4x and UFPT at 33.1x; their value grades are C and C- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer