TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-15

KWR vs MTX: Quaker Chemical Corporation vs Minerals Technologies

Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) and Minerals Technologies (MTX) on Torvanta's measures: KWR grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and MTX on 0.

KWRMTX
Value gradeC-n/a
Growth gradeCC
Profitability gradeC+C-
Momentum gradeBC-
Market value$2.7B$2.0B
P/E (trailing)28.3xn/a
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)28.9xn/a
Revenue, last 12 months$2.0B$2.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+8%+4%
Operating margin7.7%-1.3%
Return on invested capital5.3%-1.0%
Free-cash-flow yield2.7%6.1%
Total return, 1 year+21.4%+6.1%
Total return, 3 yearsn/an/a

Full KWR analysis · Full MTX analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, KWR or MTX?

Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) and Minerals Technologies (MTX) on Torvanta's measures: KWR grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and MTX on 0. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, KWR or MTX?

On trailing earnings KWR trades at 28.3x and MTX at n/a; their value grades are C- and n/a against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer