TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

KRMN vs PSN: Karman Holdings vs Parsons Corporation

Karman Holdings (KRMN) and Parsons Corporation (PSN) on Torvanta's measures: KRMN grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and PSN on 1.

KRMNPSN
Value gradeDB+
Growth gradeA+D
Profitability gradeC+C-
Momentum gradeFF
Market value$4.4B$4.5B
P/E (trailing)113.9x20.1x
Revenue, last 12 months$589.6M$6.3B
Revenue growth (y/y)+50%-7%
Operating margin16.8%6.4%
Return on invested capital18.4%8.4%
Free-cash-flow yield-0.6%9.3%
Total return, 1 year-55.5%-52.3%
Total return, 3 yearsn/a-23.3%

Full KRMN analysis · Full PSN analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, KRMN or PSN?

Karman Holdings (KRMN) and Parsons Corporation (PSN) on Torvanta's measures: KRMN grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and PSN on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, KRMN or PSN?

On trailing earnings KRMN trades at 113.9x and PSN at 20.1x; their value grades are D and B+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer