TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-14

GXO vs IESC: GXO Logistics vs IES Holdings

GXO Logistics (GXO) and IES Holdings (IESC) on Torvanta's measures: GXO grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and IESC on 4.

GXOIESC
Value gradeCB+
Growth gradeB-B+
Profitability gradeD+B
Momentum gradeC-C+
Market value$5.3B$5.3B
P/E (trailing)40.6x11.8x
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)56.3x11.0x
Revenue, last 12 months$13.6B$4.0B
Revenue growth (y/y)+8%+23%
Operating margin2.4%12.4%
Return on invested capital9.6%32.5%
Free-cash-flow yield3.4%4.3%
Total return, 1 year-15.3%+34.9%
Total return, 3 yearsn/an/a

Full GXO analysis · Full IESC analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GXO or IESC?

GXO Logistics (GXO) and IES Holdings (IESC) on Torvanta's measures: GXO grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and IESC on 4. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, GXO or IESC?

On trailing earnings GXO trades at 40.6x and IESC at 11.8x; their value grades are C and B+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer