TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

GMED vs PBF: GMED vs PBF

GMED (GMED) and PBF (PBF) on Torvanta's measures: GMED grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and PBF on 2.

GMEDPBF
Value gradeC+A-
Growth gradeB+n/a
Profitability gradeBC
Momentum gradeB-A+
Market value$10.3B$10.2B
P/E (trailing)19.6x7.4x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)17.9x7.4x
Revenue, last 12 months$3.1B$34.4B
Revenue growth (y/y)+20%+14%
Operating margin20.3%5.8%
Return on invested capital12.2%20.6%
Free-cash-flow yield7.3%7.3%
Total return, 1 year+26.6%+182.8%
Total return, 3 years+47.6%+101.0%

Full GMED analysis · Full PBF analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GMED or PBF?

GMED (GMED) and PBF (PBF) on Torvanta's measures: GMED grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and PBF on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, GMED or PBF?

On trailing earnings GMED trades at 19.6x and PBF at 7.4x; their value grades are C+ and A- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer