TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

FTI vs WHD: TechnipFMC vs Cactus, Inc.

TechnipFMC (FTI) and Cactus, Inc. (WHD) on Torvanta's measures: FTI grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and WHD on 2.

FTIWHD
Value gradeD+n/a
Growth gradeB-B
Profitability gradeB+B
Momentum gradeB-B+
Market value$27.5Bn/a
P/E (trailing)24.4xn/a
Revenue, last 12 months$10.4B$1.4B
Revenue growth (y/y)+10%+22%
Operating margin16.0%18.6%
Return on invested capital48.9%22.3%
Free-cash-flow yield5.7%n/a
Total return, 1 year+85.4%+75.7%
Total return, 3 years+273.7%+40.9%

Full FTI analysis · Full WHD analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, FTI or WHD?

TechnipFMC (FTI) and Cactus, Inc. (WHD) on Torvanta's measures: FTI grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and WHD on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, FTI or WHD?

On trailing earnings FTI trades at 24.4x and WHD at n/a; their value grades are D+ and n/a against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer