TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

FN vs RGA: FN vs RGA

FN (FN) and RGA (RGA) on Torvanta's measures: FN grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and RGA on 3.

FNRGA
Value gradeD+A-
Growth gradeB-B-
Profitability gradeCC+
Momentum gradeCA-
Market value$16.3B$16.4B
P/E (trailing)34.8x11.0x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)30.0x8.8x
Revenue, last 12 months$4.6B$26.0B
Revenue growth (y/y)+36%+19%
Operating margin10.0%n/a
Return on invested capital18.7%n/a
Free-cash-flow yield0.0%18.2%
Total return, 1 year+24.0%+29.6%
Total return, 3 years+160.7%+87.1%

Full FN analysis · Full RGA analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, FN or RGA?

FN (FN) and RGA (RGA) on Torvanta's measures: FN grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and RGA on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, FN or RGA?

On trailing earnings FN trades at 34.8x and RGA at 11.0x; their value grades are D+ and A- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer