TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

FANG vs TPL: Diamondback vs Texas Pacific Land

Diamondback (FANG) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) on Torvanta's measures: FANG grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and TPL on 1.

FANGTPL
Value gradeC-D-
Growth gradeCC-
Profitability gradeD+A
Momentum gradeC-D-
Market value$51.5B$23.8B
P/E (trailing)35.0x351.7x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)33.8x377.9x
Revenue, last 12 months$17.1B$897.5M
Revenue growth (y/y)+21%+21%
Operating margin6.3%74.9%
Return on invested capital1.8%37.4%
Free-cash-flow yield19.7%2.5%
Total return, 1 year+27.8%+10.0%
Total return, 3 years+41.6%+81.3%

Full FANG analysis · Full TPL analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, FANG or TPL?

Diamondback (FANG) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) on Torvanta's measures: FANG grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and TPL on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, FANG or TPL?

On trailing earnings FANG trades at 35.0x and TPL at 351.7x; their value grades are C- and D- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer