TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

ESI vs FCFS: ESI vs FCFS

ESI (ESI) and FCFS (FCFS) on Torvanta's measures: ESI grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and FCFS on 4.

ESIFCFS
Value gradeDC
Growth gradeD+B
Profitability gradeCB
Momentum gradeB-B
Market value$9.1B$9.2B
P/E (trailing)60.5x24.1x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)67.2x21.3x
Revenue, last 12 months$2.8B$4.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+13%+22%
Operating margin13.4%n/a
Return on invested capital9.6%n/a
Free-cash-flow yieldn/a7.3%
Total return, 1 year+41.1%+40.4%
Total return, 3 years+105.4%+116.4%

Full ESI analysis · Full FCFS analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, ESI or FCFS?

ESI (ESI) and FCFS (FCFS) on Torvanta's measures: ESI grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and FCFS on 4. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, ESI or FCFS?

On trailing earnings ESI trades at 60.5x and FCFS at 24.1x; their value grades are D and C against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer