TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

EQT vs FANG: EQT Corp vs Diamondback

EQT Corp (EQT) and Diamondback (FANG) on Torvanta's measures: EQT grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and FANG on 1.

EQTFANG
Value gradeA-C-
Growth gradeB+C
Profitability gradeBD+
Momentum gradeDC-
Market value$32.0B$51.5B
P/E (trailing)11.9x35.0x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)8.9x33.8x
Revenue, last 12 months$9.5B$17.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+32%+21%
Operating margin42.5%6.3%
Return on invested capital10.2%1.8%
Free-cash-flow yield11.8%19.7%
Total return, 1 year-7.7%+27.8%
Total return, 3 years+29.8%+41.6%

Full EQT analysis · Full FANG analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, EQT or FANG?

EQT Corp (EQT) and Diamondback (FANG) on Torvanta's measures: EQT grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and FANG on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, EQT or FANG?

On trailing earnings EQT trades at 11.9x and FANG at 35.0x; their value grades are A- and C- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer