TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

EPAC vs KMT: Enerpac Tool Group vs Kennametal

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) and Kennametal (KMT) on Torvanta's measures: EPAC grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and KMT on 3.

EPACKMT
Value gradeB-B+
Growth gradeC+B
Profitability gradeA-B
Momentum gradeB-B
Market value$1.8B$2.5B
P/E (trailing)20.4x7.4x
Revenue, last 12 months$634.1M$2.4B
Revenue growth (y/y)+4%+20%
Operating margin21.2%20.1%
Return on invested capital20.7%24.3%
Free-cash-flow yield6.1%-3.2%
Total return, 1 year-11.1%+53.5%
Total return, 3 years+35.9%+45.8%

Full EPAC analysis · Full KMT analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, EPAC or KMT?

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) and Kennametal (KMT) on Torvanta's measures: EPAC grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and KMT on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, EPAC or KMT?

On trailing earnings EPAC trades at 20.4x and KMT at 7.4x; their value grades are B- and B+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer