TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

EPAC vs HMN: EPAC vs HMN

EPAC (EPAC) and HMN (HMN) on Torvanta's measures: EPAC grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and HMN on 1.

EPACHMN
Value gradeCA-
Growth gradeC+C+
Profitability gradeB+B
Momentum gradeC+C
Market value$1.8B$1.8B
P/E (trailing)20.4x10.7x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)19.2x9.7x
Revenue, last 12 months$634.1M$1.7B
Revenue growth (y/y)+4%+6%
Operating margin21.2%n/a
Return on invested capital20.7%n/a
Free-cash-flow yield6.1%30.7%
Total return, 1 year-12.7%+5.9%
Total return, 3 years+32.9%+71.4%

Full EPAC analysis · Full HMN analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, EPAC or HMN?

EPAC (EPAC) and HMN (HMN) on Torvanta's measures: EPAC grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and HMN on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, EPAC or HMN?

On trailing earnings EPAC trades at 20.4x and HMN at 10.7x; their value grades are C and A- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer