TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

EMN vs MOS: Eastman Chemical vs Mosaic

Eastman Chemical (EMN) and Mosaic (MOS) on Torvanta's measures: EMN grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and MOS on 0.

EMNMOS
Value gradeBC
Growth gradeD+D+
Profitability gradeC-D-
Momentum gradeCD+
Market value$7.4B$6.8B
P/E (trailing)16.9xn/a
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)17.7xn/a
Revenue, last 12 months$8.9B$12.2B
Revenue growth (y/y)-5%+9%
Operating marginn/a-1.4%
Return on invested capitaln/a-1.2%
Free-cash-flow yield7.3%-14.0%
Total return, 1 year+6.5%-36.1%
Total return, 3 years-0.2%-31.3%

Full EMN analysis · Full MOS analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, EMN or MOS?

Eastman Chemical (EMN) and Mosaic (MOS) on Torvanta's measures: EMN grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and MOS on 0. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, EMN or MOS?

On trailing earnings EMN trades at 16.9x and MOS at n/a; their value grades are B and C against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer