TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

EAT vs MHK: Brinker International, Inc. vs Mohawk Industries

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Mohawk Industries (MHK) on Torvanta's measures: EAT grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and MHK on 1.

EATMHK
Value gradeC-C+
Growth gradeBB-
Profitability gradeA-D+
Momentum gradeB+B+
Market value$8.7B$8.5B
P/E (trailing)17.9x16.5x
Revenue, last 12 months$5.8B$11.2B
Revenue growth (y/y)+8%+5%
Operating margin10.7%5.1%
Return on invested capital146.8%5.0%
Free-cash-flow yield6.4%9.6%
Total return, 1 year+53.5%-1.0%
Total return, 3 years+558.0%+53.3%

Full EAT analysis · Full MHK analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, EAT or MHK?

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Mohawk Industries (MHK) on Torvanta's measures: EAT grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and MHK on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, EAT or MHK?

On trailing earnings EAT trades at 17.9x and MHK at 16.5x; their value grades are C- and C+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer