TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-14

DVA vs UHS: DaVita vs Universal Health

DaVita (DVA) and Universal Health (UHS) on Torvanta's measures: DVA grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and UHS on 0.

DVAUHS
Value gradeAA
Growth gradeBC
Profitability gradeC+C+
Momentum gradeC-C-
Market value$11.5B$11.1B
P/E (trailing)14.9x7.6x
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)11.4x8.3x
Revenue, last 12 months$14.0B$18.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+6%+10%
Operating margin15.2%11.4%
Return on invested capital17.9%12.9%
Free-cash-flow yield14.0%7.6%
Total return, 1 year+42.6%-8.4%
Total return, 3 years+146.8%+51.9%

Full DVA analysis · Full UHS analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, DVA or UHS?

DaVita (DVA) and Universal Health (UHS) on Torvanta's measures: DVA grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and UHS on 0. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, DVA or UHS?

On trailing earnings DVA trades at 14.9x and UHS at 7.6x; their value grades are A and A against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer