TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

DECK vs LULU: Deckers vs Lululemon

Deckers (DECK) and Lululemon (LULU) on Torvanta's measures: DECK grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and LULU on 1.

DECKLULU
Value gradeB+A+
Growth gradeB-D+
Profitability gradeA-B-
Momentum gradeD+D-
Market value$10.9B$9.8B
P/E (trailing)11.3x7.7x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)11.0x7.8x
Revenue, last 12 months$5.5B$11.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+8%+2%
Operating margin22.7%17.8%
Return on invested capital141.6%41.1%
Free-cash-flow yield10.2%13.8%
Total return, 1 year-22.2%-47.0%
Total return, 3 years-3.1%-74.2%

Full DECK analysis · Full LULU analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, DECK or LULU?

Deckers (DECK) and Lululemon (LULU) on Torvanta's measures: DECK grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and LULU on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, DECK or LULU?

On trailing earnings DECK trades at 11.3x and LULU at 7.7x; their value grades are B+ and A+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer