TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-16

CTS vs FN: CTS Corporation vs Fabrinet

CTS Corporation (CTS) and Fabrinet (FN) on Torvanta's measures: CTS grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and FN on 3.

CTSFN
Value graden/aC
Growth gradeCB-
Profitability graden/aC+
Momentum gradeB-D
Market valuen/a$13.0B
P/E (trailing)n/a27.9x
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)SubscribersSubscribers
Revenue, last 12 months$554.8M$4.6B
Revenue growth (y/y)n/a+36%
Operating margin15.9%10.0%
Return on invested capitaln/a18.7%
Free-cash-flow yield5.6%0.0%
Total return, 1 year+34.4%-11.9%
Total return, 3 yearsn/an/a

Full CTS analysis · Full FN analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CTS or FN?

CTS Corporation (CTS) and Fabrinet (FN) on Torvanta's measures: CTS grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and FN on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CTS or FN?

On trailing earnings CTS trades at n/a and FN at 27.9x; their value grades are n/a and C against their sectors.

See the Stock Analyst's view

Subscribers get a rating, a fair value estimate, a 12-month target and a risk read for every S&P 500 company, Torvanta's earnings estimates, and three model portfolios (Active, Adaptive and Patient) with every trade sized and explained. A free account includes 3 full Stock Analyst reports a month.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer