TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-16

CRS vs ZWS: Carpenter Technology vs Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.

Carpenter Technology (CRS) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. (ZWS) on Torvanta's measures: CRS grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and ZWS on 1.

CRSZWS
Value gradeD+n/a
Growth gradeBB-
Profitability gradeB+n/a
Momentum gradeC-B
Market value$18.7Bn/a
P/E (trailing)35.8xn/a
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)SubscribersSubscribers
Revenue, last 12 months$3.1B$1.7B
Revenue growth (y/y)+9%n/a
Operating margin22.5%17.1%
Return on invested capital22.4%n/a
Free-cash-flow yield1.9%4.4%
Total return, 1 year+58.7%+3.4%
Total return, 3 yearsn/an/a

Full CRS analysis · Full ZWS analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CRS or ZWS?

Carpenter Technology (CRS) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. (ZWS) on Torvanta's measures: CRS grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and ZWS on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CRS or ZWS?

On trailing earnings CRS trades at 35.8x and ZWS at n/a; their value grades are D+ and n/a against their sectors.

See the Stock Analyst's view

Subscribers get a rating, a fair value estimate, a 12-month target and a risk read for every S&P 500 company, Torvanta's earnings estimates, and three model portfolios (Active, Adaptive and Patient) with every trade sized and explained. A free account includes 3 full Stock Analyst reports a month.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer