TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

COST vs PM: Costco vs Philip Morris

Costco (COST) and Philip Morris (PM) on Torvanta's measures: COST grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and PM on 4.

COSTPM
Value gradeD-C-
Growth gradeBB+
Profitability gradeCA+
Momentum gradeB-A
Market value$409.6B$295.4B
P/E (trailing)46.5x27.2x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)44.6x26.3x
Revenue, last 12 months$293.6B$42.5B
Revenue growth (y/y)+9%+9%
Operating margin3.8%37.7%
Return on invested capital43.8%n/a
Free-cash-flow yield2.2%4.3%
Total return, 1 year+1.5%+28.0%
Total return, 3 years+68.7%+133.1%

Full COST analysis · Full PM analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, COST or PM?

Costco (COST) and Philip Morris (PM) on Torvanta's measures: COST grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and PM on 4. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, COST or PM?

On trailing earnings COST trades at 46.5x and PM at 27.2x; their value grades are D- and C- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer