TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

CLH vs MEDP: CLH vs MEDP

CLH (CLH) and MEDP (MEDP) on Torvanta's measures: CLH grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and MEDP on 3.

CLHMEDP
Value gradeDD+
Growth gradeCB
Profitability gradeC+A-
Momentum gradeA-A-
Market value$17.0B$17.3B
P/E (trailing)43.6x36.4x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)41.7x33.1x
Revenue, last 12 months$6.1B$2.8B
Revenue growth (y/y)+2%+25%
Operating margin11.2%21.0%
Return on invested capital10.0%n/a
Free-cash-flow yield2.7%4.1%
Total return, 1 year+41.2%+16.5%
Total return, 3 years+99.0%+154.2%

Full CLH analysis · Full MEDP analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CLH or MEDP?

CLH (CLH) and MEDP (MEDP) on Torvanta's measures: CLH grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and MEDP on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CLH or MEDP?

On trailing earnings CLH trades at 43.6x and MEDP at 36.4x; their value grades are D and D+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer