TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-12

CHDN vs CROX: Churchill Downs Inc. vs Crocs

Churchill Downs Inc. (CHDN) and Crocs (CROX) on Torvanta's measures: CHDN grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and CROX on 3.

CHDNCROX
Value gradeBB+
Growth gradeBC+
Profitability gradeBA-
Momentum gradeCB
Market value$5.6B$5.6B
P/E (trailing)13.7x10.2x
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)10.6x9.3x
Revenue, last 12 months$3.0B$4.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+6%-2%
Operating margin24.1%20.7%
Return on invested capital8.7%26.0%
Free-cash-flow yield8.3%12.6%
Total return, 1 year-10.2%+52.4%
Total return, 3 yearsn/an/a

Full CHDN analysis · Full CROX analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CHDN or CROX?

Churchill Downs Inc. (CHDN) and Crocs (CROX) on Torvanta's measures: CHDN grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and CROX on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CHDN or CROX?

On trailing earnings CHDN trades at 13.7x and CROX at 10.2x; their value grades are B and B+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer