TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-07

CHCO vs UMBF: City Holding Company vs UMB Financial Corp.

City Holding Company (CHCO) and UMB Financial Corp. (UMBF) on Torvanta's measures: CHCO grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and UMBF on 2.

CHCOUMBF
Value graden/aB
Growth gradeC+B+
Profitability graden/an/a
Momentum gradeA-C
Market valuen/a$9.7B
P/E (trailing)n/a10.7x
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)n/a9.9x
Revenue, last 12 monthsn/an/a
Revenue growth (y/y)n/an/a
Operating margin0.0%n/a
Return on invested capitaln/an/a
Free-cash-flow yield9.2%10.7%
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+9.8%
Total return, 3 yearsn/an/a

Full CHCO analysis · Full UMBF analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CHCO or UMBF?

City Holding Company (CHCO) and UMB Financial Corp. (UMBF) on Torvanta's measures: CHCO grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and UMBF on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CHCO or UMBF?

On trailing earnings CHCO trades at n/a and UMBF at 10.7x; their value grades are n/a and B against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer