TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

CENTA vs EPC: Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) vs Edgewell Personal Care

Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) (CENTA) and Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) on Torvanta's measures: CENTA grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and EPC on 1.

CENTAEPC
Value gradeA-D
Growth gradeB-D+
Profitability gradeB-D+
Momentum gradeB-A-
Market value$2.1B$1.2B
P/E (trailing)12.7xn/a
Revenue, last 12 months$3.1B$2.0B
Revenue growth (y/y)-1%-7%
Operating margin8.1%-0.6%
Return on invested capital9.8%-0.4%
Free-cash-flow yield16.3%4.3%
Total return, 1 year+21.2%+38.1%
Total return, 3 years+8.3%-19.7%

Full CENTA analysis · Full EPC analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CENTA or EPC?

Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) (CENTA) and Edgewell Personal Care (EPC) on Torvanta's measures: CENTA grades higher on 3 of the 4 factor families and EPC on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CENTA or EPC?

On trailing earnings CENTA trades at 12.7x and EPC at n/a; their value grades are A- and D against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer