TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

CENTA vs ENR: Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) vs Energizer

Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) (CENTA) and Energizer (ENR) on Torvanta's measures: CENTA grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and ENR on 2.

CENTAENR
Value gradeA-B-
Growth gradeB-D+
Profitability gradeB-B
Momentum gradeB-B+
Market value$2.1B$1.5B
P/E (trailing)12.7x18.3x
Revenue, last 12 months$3.1B$3.0B
Revenue growth (y/y)-1%+2%
Operating margin8.1%n/a
Return on invested capital9.8%n/a
Free-cash-flow yield16.3%10.4%
Total return, 1 year+21.2%-6.6%
Total return, 3 years+8.3%-15.6%

Full CENTA analysis · Full ENR analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CENTA or ENR?

Central Garden & Pet Company (Class A) (CENTA) and Energizer (ENR) on Torvanta's measures: CENTA grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and ENR on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CENTA or ENR?

On trailing earnings CENTA trades at 12.7x and ENR at 18.3x; their value grades are A- and B- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer