TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

CELH vs ENS: CELH vs ENS

CELH (CELH) and ENS (ENS) on Torvanta's measures: CELH grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and ENS on 3.

CELHENS
Value gradeDC+
Growth gradeB-B-
Profitability gradeC+B-
Momentum gradeD-B
Market value$7.0B$7.0B
P/E (trailing)119.7x20.7x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)121.7x19.1x
Revenue, last 12 months$3.0B$3.8B
Revenue growth (y/y)+83%+4%
Operating margin5.3%13.0%
Return on invested capital11.8%16.8%
Free-cash-flow yield6.6%10.3%
Total return, 1 year-53.1%+69.2%
Total return, 3 years-46.1%+113.8%

Full CELH analysis · Full ENS analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CELH or ENS?

CELH (CELH) and ENS (ENS) on Torvanta's measures: CELH grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and ENS on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CELH or ENS?

On trailing earnings CELH trades at 119.7x and ENS at 20.7x; their value grades are D and C+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer