TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

CAH vs MCK: Cardinal Health vs McKesson

Cardinal Health (CAH) and McKesson (MCK) on Torvanta's measures: CAH grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and MCK on 3.

CAHMCK
Value graden/aB-
Growth gradeB-B
Profitability graden/aC-
Momentum gradeB-B-
Market valuen/a$106.7B
P/E (trailing)n/a24.5x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)n/a21.8x
Revenue, last 12 monthsn/a$411.0B
Revenue growth (y/y)n/a+9%
Operating margin1.0%1.6%
Return on invested capitaln/a1640.1%
Free-cash-flow yield10.3%6.0%
Total return, 1 year+52.3%+24.5%
Total return, 3 years+170.9%+108.1%

Full CAH analysis · Full MCK analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, CAH or MCK?

Cardinal Health (CAH) and McKesson (MCK) on Torvanta's measures: CAH grades higher on 0 of the 4 factor families and MCK on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, CAH or MCK?

On trailing earnings CAH trades at n/a and MCK at 24.5x; their value grades are n/a and B- against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer