TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

BWA vs LULU: BorgWarner vs Lululemon

BorgWarner (BWA) and Lululemon (LULU) on Torvanta's measures: BWA grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and LULU on 2.

BWALULU
Value gradeC+A+
Growth gradeBD+
Profitability gradeDB-
Momentum gradeBD-
Market value$12.3B$9.8B
P/E (trailing)29.7x7.7x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)24.6x7.8x
Revenue, last 12 months$14.3B$11.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+2%+2%
Operating margin5.0%17.8%
Return on invested capital5.1%41.1%
Free-cash-flow yield8.9%13.8%
Total return, 1 year+36.3%-47.0%
Total return, 3 years+62.2%-74.2%

Full BWA analysis · Full LULU analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, BWA or LULU?

BorgWarner (BWA) and Lululemon (LULU) on Torvanta's measures: BWA grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and LULU on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, BWA or LULU?

On trailing earnings BWA trades at 29.7x and LULU at 7.7x; their value grades are C+ and A+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer