TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

BIO vs GMED: BIO vs GMED

BIO (BIO) and GMED (GMED) on Torvanta's measures: BIO grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and GMED on 3.

BIOGMED
Value gradeDC+
Growth gradeDB+
Profitability gradeC-B
Momentum gradeA-B-
Market value$10.2B$10.3B
P/E (trailing)47.5x19.6x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)58.0x17.9x
Revenue, last 12 months$2.6B$3.1B
Revenue growth (y/y)+1%+20%
Operating margin2.1%20.3%
Return on invested capital0.5%12.2%
Free-cash-flow yield3.5%7.3%
Total return, 1 year+24.3%+26.6%
Total return, 3 years+6.9%+47.6%

Full BIO analysis · Full GMED analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, BIO or GMED?

BIO (BIO) and GMED (GMED) on Torvanta's measures: BIO grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and GMED on 3. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, BIO or GMED?

On trailing earnings BIO trades at 47.5x and GMED at 19.6x; their value grades are D and C+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer