TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-06

BAH vs FCN: Booz Allen Hamilton vs FTI Consulting

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and FTI Consulting (FCN) on Torvanta's measures: BAH grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and FCN on 1.

BAHFCN
Value gradeAB
Growth gradeD+B-
Profitability gradeB+C+
Momentum gradeC-C-
Market value$8.3B$3.8B
P/E (trailing)10.8x16.6x
Revenue, last 12 months$11.1B$3.9B
Revenue growth (y/y)-7%+7%
Operating margin9.5%9.7%
Return on invested capital19.9%12.5%
Free-cash-flow yield13.5%9.4%
Total return, 1 year-31.8%-14.3%
Total return, 3 years-38.9%-27.3%

Full BAH analysis · Full FCN analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, BAH or FCN?

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) and FTI Consulting (FCN) on Torvanta's measures: BAH grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and FCN on 1. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, BAH or FCN?

On trailing earnings BAH trades at 10.8x and FCN at 16.6x; their value grades are A and B against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer