TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

AVT vs EAT: AVT vs EAT

AVT (AVT) and EAT (EAT) on Torvanta's measures: AVT grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and EAT on 2.

AVTEAT
Value gradeC-C+
Growth gradeB-B-
Profitability gradeDB+
Momentum gradeA+B
Market value$8.7B$8.7B
P/E (trailing)26.4x17.9x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)20.9x16.3x
Revenue, last 12 months$27.6B$5.8B
Revenue growth (y/y)+24%+8%
Operating margin2.6%10.7%
Return on invested capital6.4%146.8%
Free-cash-flow yield-4.1%6.4%
Total return, 1 year+109.0%+53.4%
Total return, 3 years+137.3%+535.8%

Full AVT analysis · Full EAT analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, AVT or EAT?

AVT (AVT) and EAT (EAT) on Torvanta's measures: AVT grades higher on 1 of the 4 factor families and EAT on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, AVT or EAT?

On trailing earnings AVT trades at 26.4x and EAT at 17.9x; their value grades are C- and C+ against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer