TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

AMN vs MBC: AMN vs MBC

AMN (AMN) and MBC (MBC) on Torvanta's measures: AMN grades higher on 4 of the 4 factor families and MBC on 0.

AMNMBC
Value gradeA-n/a
Growth gradeA-D-
Profitability gradeB-D
Momentum gradeAD-
Market value$1.4B$1.4B
P/E (trailing)13.7xn/a
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)13.7xn/a
Revenue, last 12 months$3.4B$2.8B
Revenue growth (y/y)+24%-0%
Operating margin5.8%-1.1%
Return on invested capital34.2%-0.8%
Free-cash-flow yield30.8%5.2%
Total return, 1 year+79.4%-47.5%
Total return, 3 years-55.7%-38.9%

Full AMN analysis · Full MBC analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, AMN or MBC?

AMN (AMN) and MBC (MBC) on Torvanta's measures: AMN grades higher on 4 of the 4 factor families and MBC on 0. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, AMN or MBC?

On trailing earnings AMN trades at 13.7x and MBC at n/a; their value grades are A- and n/a against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer