TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-07

AMAT vs INTC: Applied Materials vs Intel

Applied Materials (AMAT) and Intel (INTC) on Torvanta's measures: AMAT grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and INTC on 2.

AMATINTC
Value gradeCD
Growth gradeCC+
Profitability gradeC+D-
Momentum gradeCB-
Market value$413.2B$570.6B
P/E (trailing)44.9xn/a
Forward P/E (Torvanta model estimate)32.3x69.8x
Revenue, last 12 months$30.8B$57.0B
Revenue growth (y/y)+8%+7%
Operating margin29.6%-0.1%
Return on invested capital31.5%-0.0%
Free-cash-flow yield1.4%0.5%
Total return, 1 year+147.5%+204.3%
Total return, 3 years+280.0%+217.9%

Full AMAT analysis · Full INTC analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, AMAT or INTC?

Applied Materials (AMAT) and Intel (INTC) on Torvanta's measures: AMAT grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and INTC on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, AMAT or INTC?

On trailing earnings AMAT trades at 44.9x and INTC at n/a; their value grades are C and D against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer