TORVANTA
Compare · data as of 2026-10-05

ALHC vs NTST: ALHC vs NTST

ALHC (ALHC) and NTST (NTST) on Torvanta's measures: ALHC grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and NTST on 2.

ALHCNTST
Value gradeCD
Growth gradeA+B+
Profitability gradeC-C+
Momentum gradeFC-
Market value$1.8B$1.8B
P/E (trailing)44.7x124.6x
Forward P/E (Torvanta estimate)29.8x96.9x
Revenue, last 12 months$4.6B$219.2M
Revenue growth (y/y)+37%+22%
Operating margin1.2%n/a
Return on invested capitaln/an/a
Free-cash-flow yield10.1%6.8%
Total return, 1 year-48.9%-1.3%
Total return, 3 years+18.4%+33.5%

Full ALHC analysis · Full NTST analysis

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, ALHC or NTST?

ALHC (ALHC) and NTST (NTST) on Torvanta's measures: ALHC grades higher on 2 of the 4 factor families and NTST on 2. Which fits an investor depends on their goals; this is research, not a recommendation. Subscribers see where the model ranks each and its expected return.

Which is cheaper, ALHC or NTST?

On trailing earnings ALHC trades at 44.7x and NTST at 124.6x; their value grades are C and D against their sectors.

See the model's view

Subscribers get the model's rank and expected return for every covered company, the reasoning behind each, and the Torvanta model portfolio's trades each trading day, sized and explained, at three risk levels.

See plans Or get the free weekly newsletter

Torvanta is research only - not investment advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Grades describe a company's reported data against its sector; they are not the model's view, change as data changes and can be wrong. Financial figures come from the company's SEC filings; returns include reinvested dividends. Past performance does not predict future results.

All stock ratings · Stock lists · AI stock research · Model portfolio · Research · Disclaimer